On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 22:10:46 +0100, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: >Interesting. I wonder what the most and least efficient linux fs is for >many small files. In some of my data collection systems, this is a common >file type. Others will have this and some files that are quite large. But >never as many very large files.
hpfs used a 512 byte cluster size...... _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
