I dont know about 2k but the other not NT versions have to be, I think win calls it "first active partition" or some such, but I think you can set that when you partition. But I recall installing windows98 on the second drive of a box once, but again, I had to set the partiton to active. FWIW
On Thu, 29 May 2003 15:18:24 -0400 (EDT) - Net Llama! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following Re: Re: XFS resizing & Win2k >On Thu, 29 May 2003, Andrew Mathews wrote: >> | ugh. oh well, i guess i'll give it a whirl. thanks. >> | >> | Anyone know if Win2k has any ridiculous need to be on hda1, or will it be >> | ok sitting on hda4? >> | >> >> No, it needs to be on C:\ <slap> > >Seriously, does win2k need to be on the first partition of the primary >master IDE channel? I don't want to go through all of this to find out >that win2k won't fly. > >-- >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com >_______________________________________________ >Linux-users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> >http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
