I'm wondering why you're doing this in the first place. Why not just run a uniproc kernel?
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: > > How many out there are using a Linux kernel compiled with SMP support on a > non-SMP (one processor) system? > > We have, over the last year or so, found numerous problems when doing so. > Anyone else. > > Problems encountered with SMP was compiled into the kernel that went away > when it was compiled out: > > 1. Serial port providing continuous data suddenly begins reporting > incorrect info on available data when run asynchronously (SIGIO). > > 2. Firewire disks causing kernel panic on system boot. > > 3. Continuously active TCP ports suddenly going 'quiet', when data is > indeed available. > > Adding the 'nosmp' directive to the kernel command line offers no joy. > Only a compile without SMP solves these things. Every time. > > I have been looking for a coherent thread about this that does not just > end with someone claiming the user is an idiot. I make mistakes, but I > know a trend when I see one. > > This is just a query. Am I alone? Anyone else having issues here? Or know > of anyone making similarly bizarre claims? > > (I would discuss kernel versions here, but I am not sure it is a simple > indicator. Also, the systems that show the problems have been dissimilar.) > > > -- > Very Cloudy Stockholm > Roger Oberholtzer > _______________________________________________ > Linux-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
