On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
> > Upgrading glibc to 2.3 shouldn't be hard.  I've done it several times
> > withou any problems.  Going to 3.x is another story altogether.  If you
> > plan to maintain this box for a long time, you'll be saving youself a ton
> > of grief by upgrading glibc.
>
> So it 'could' be as simple as compiling/installing it? No dependency
> hassles?

Not as far as I know.  Its good to have reasonably recent versions of
binutils, gcc & kernel, but those aren't requirements as
much as recommendations.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J Friedman                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo                  http://netllama.ipfox.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to