On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 14:37:01 -0400 - Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following Re: Re: Blame [OT]
>On 7/2/2003 1:50 PM, someone claiming to be ronnie gauthier wrote: ><snip-a-roo> > >I believe Vern has a point here. This thread started OT, had *nothing* >remotely to do with linux, and should've been started on general. That's >Tom Condon's fault. Dunno if he's sub'd to general or not, but his >origianl post shoulda gone there. As should have any of our replies. > I dont agree one bit. The only list without OT posts is a moderated list. This is a well run list and Doug does a great job at moderating and kicking OT's to the general list if needed. OT posts are what make the list has personalities instead of just handles that supply answers. OT posts let people unwind and crack jokes. Just like any social gathering, nothing stays on topic, its how the topic changes are handled that dictate the success of the gathering. And you know, or should know, the history of OT posts here which either quickly run their course or get kicked to general. That, IMHO, is what makes this list better than others of the same catagory. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
