Any judge in their right mind will be able to see through this. Politics aside, the judge would have to concede that SCO's tactics have been completely self-serving and not in accord with a desire to resolve anything. Since the code is already public, listing code that has been allegedly infringed upon would not in any way further any possible damages. No, this is SCO's attempts to make money off of Linux since they were unable to do so using more conventional means (ie. SELLING IT!)
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 08:16:39 +0200 Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problem is that as soon as SCO make public which code is effected (if > any), it will be reimplemented. Making the need for a license go away. -- Matthew Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.eisgr.com/ Enterprise Information Systems * Network Service Appliances * Network Consulting, Integration & Support * Web Integration and E-Business _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
