Quoth Ben Duncan: > > FROM: > > http://www.infoconomy.com/pages/news-and-gossip/group83631.adp
[snip] > Ok, Now for my Question(s) and MAYBE someone more fimiliar with kernel > development can correct me. > > A: Their Claim is against the 2.4 and latter kernel. Right? > It is AGAINST NUMA, RCU and JFS and XFS being included > in the 2.4 and latter stuff .... right? Ostensibly, SCO are claiming that 2.4 and later are problematic. XFS is SGI's contribution, and, so far, hasn't been identified as offending code. > B: They are CLAIMING over 1 million lines of code "stolen" right? > Does not the 2.2 kernel itself, in which they have not problem with > have around 4 million lines of code? They're smoking crack. They've got to show _all_ of the offending code and _then_ prove it was "stolen." > My question is , based on the amount of code "stolen", and put into the > latest kernel ..... and based upon the 4 (+/-) million lines of kernel > code in 2.2 > WOULD NOT this be a almost MAJOR COMPLETE rewrite of the kernel > to replace with the 1 to 2 million lines of code SCO says is stolen ? That's the claim. But it's bogus. Kurt -- "Last week a cop stopped me in my car. He asked me if I had a police record. I said, no, but I have the new DEVO album. Cops have no sense of humor." _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
