On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:51:56 -0400 Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/10/2003 9:27 AM, I believe that James McDonald wrote: > > > Collins Richey wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:25:36 -0500 Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> Could somebody tell me what I'm doing wrong, or is RPM a Microsoft > >>> conspiracy to make Linux look bad: > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> I love it! Will file this away. RPM, like any other software > >> product, has > >> syntax that must be learned. That being said, any package manager > >> that does not > >> do dependancy resolution is borken, from my perspective. > >> > >> > >> > > So that raises a question. What application can replace rpm and provide > > dependency resolution? > > > > Suggestions anyone. > > > > > > apt4rpm > Tell us more! Does apt4rpm really run the dependancy chains and download prerequisites? That would make RPM almost tolerable. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the worries of tomorrow, you have no today to be thankful for. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
