I agree with your assessment. This movie was a proper end to a bad a@@
trilogy. The film critics I've read seemed to have missed the real message
in the movie. Definitely a good one to see.
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/12/2003 09:32:49 PM:
> Just in case you've read the bad reviews and got turned off, Matrix III
> is at least 2x as good as Matrix II. The reviewers must like mindless,
> repetitive kung fu and must not like interesting dialogue that probes
> the meaning of the human experience, heavily interlaced with the usual
> astounding special effects. There was even some drama in this one. There
> wasn't much kung fu, either, must to my relief. Oh yea, it would really
> have been great if Keanu Reeves had pretended to act, but, I guess
> wishing for Sean Connery in every scene spoils some of the fun.
> <Disclaimer> I said this was OT, didn't I ?</disclaimer>
> Joel
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.
> org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message (including any attachments) may contain information
which is confidential or privileged. Use, dissemination, distribution,
or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not
authorized and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://smtp.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
