On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 23:01:42 -0500
"Alan Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 18:57:46 -0700 Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to know the differences I can expect to encounter if I go
> from
> > eD2.4 to RH7.1.
>
> I just did this a few months ago. Now I'm trying to move from RH 7.1
> to
> Caldera 3.1.
>
> RH has it's nice points, teh new KDE for example. However, perl is
> broken,
> gcc has probnlms, and I have some nagging problems I don't understand
> that
> I hope will go away when I get Caldera running.
>
> The thing I hate is that they don't use /usr/local like everyone else.
> Or
> /opt. Makes it harder to segregate executables onto other disk
> partitions
> and generally manage stuff.
Well, this gives me pause. What do they use instead of /usr/local and
/opt? In reading the newsgroups, it seems most users are fairly happy
with it, but maybe they don't know any better.
I'd go with caldera except they have no upgrade pricing, and per seat
licensing. Sort of ticked me off. And I see lots of complaints on the
newsgroups.
(But this is old news, lets not go there :-)
--
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
