Yes. The compiler binary needs to know where the libs it was built for are located. --- Linuxism Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I upgrade edesktop 2.4's glibc without > updating the gcc compiler, > will I got the same error? > > Net Llama wrote: > > User error strikes again. Turns out that this had nothing to do > with > > libstdc++.so. I still had the old version of /usr/bin/c++ with the > > newer version of the libs. So the older c++ binary was looking for > the > > older libs and not finding them. I rebuilt the SRPM for gcc, and > then > > installed the g++ RPM. Problem fixed. ===== ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux FAQ & Step-by-step help: http://netllama.ipfox.com . __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
