I thought you were about police procedures... be civilized a little bit...
Ronnie Gauthier wrote:
>uh, http://www.remington.com
>
>On Tuesday 18 September 2001 01:03, Chang wrote:
>
>>you guys interseted me,. where is the full documentation for these?
>>iinternal useonly? or you guys were playing with numbers? :)
>>
>>Ronnie Gauthier wrote:
>>
>>>I think that shortly we will be able to use rule .270 or .300 under the
>>>personal choice option.
>>>Also, I do believe that rule .50 should be seriously considered as a good
>>>long range solution.
>>>
>>>On Monday 17 September 2001 21:07, dep wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Monday 17 September 2001 21:07, Chang wrote:
>>>>| Then find out why Ladden did it? Talk to him before making a
>>>>| military arrest. :)
>>>>
>>>>as i understand it, our arrest of him will be under a provision of
>>>>british military law, rule .303. we had a version of that, rule .308,
>>>>but we wimped out and now are stuck with our own rule .223.
>>>>
>>_________________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
>>->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
>>
>
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
