Was daemon supposed to be snedmails gid, a ##? and http as well to be a ##?

Im bout to try it all over again    8^)    even thought it only took me 
3housr last night    8^(


On Wednesday 31 October 2001 02:11, you were heard blurting out:
> heres the exactline i used  wanna bet I screwed it up somehow  8^)
>
> /configure --prefix=/opt/mailman --with-mail-gid=daemon
> --with-cgi-gid=http
>
> let me guess 2 screweps  first daemon is not right? and second I should
> ahve used 55 in place of http?...
>
> what kinda recourse do you suggest from scratch...?
>
> On Wednesday 31 October 2001 01:49, you were heard blurting out:
> > Mailman CGI error!!! The expected gid of the Mailman CGI wrapper did not
> > match the gid as set by the Web server.
> >
> > The most likely cause is that Mailman was configured and installed
> > incorrectly. Please read the INSTALL instructions again, paying close
> > attention to the --with-cgi-gid configure option. This entry is being
> > stored in your syslog:
> > Failure to exec script. WANTED gid 55, GOT gid 65534.  (Reconfigure to
> > take 65534?)
> >
> > The exec script wanted group http, got group nobody...  Reconfigure to
> > take group nobody...?
> >
> > I dont understand what its telling me here other than that...

-- 
  Bill Day ( a.k.a. BadMan ) 188133 http://counter.li.org 
  irc.openprojects.net     #linux-users ( Open 24/7 )
  Our crystal tears now fall upon the ashes, but from the dust shall
  grow a new spirit, to be in compassion for those who are lost, and
  one in determination to break those who dare test our resolve to be
                                   free....
  <------------------------------------------------------------------->
                 http://www.daysdomain.com/tribute.html
  <------------------------------------------------------------------->
 10:30am  up 91 days, 58 min, 27 users,  load average: 0.15, 0.30, 0.23
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to