Mike Andrew babbled on about:
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 03:01, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> > copy it to /boot and append the kernel version to it..
> > i.e /boot/System.map-2.4.14
>
> My current 'method' is a permanent
>
> cd /boot
> rm System.map
> ln -s /usr/src/linux/System.map System.map
>
> this assumes that /usr/src/linux is itself a symlink to the current kernel
> (not always the case).
>
> there was a post sometime earlier that if you had a series of
>
> /boot/System.map-2.4.xx's
>
> the kernel would  'discover' for itself which one to use. Is this correct?
> David Bandel mentions the klogd daemon starting early in the boot scripts.
> Is the name 'System.map' with no extensions a necessity for some other,
> obscure, applications?

your  method should work fine. IIRC, the kernel looks for System.map-`uname 
-r` first and then System.map (first in /boot, then in /usr/src/linux
You can mdify this by playing with the klogd command line options in 
/etc/rc.d as David stated. the only other thing that uses the System.map file 
is a kernel debugger, or ksymoops (which decodes a kernel panic). And they 
should follow the same kernel conventions (above).

In reality, you can run without a System.map without any significant adverse 
affects.
-- 
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
Admin: http://linux.nf  Admin: http://hunley.homeip.net

The software said it requires Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to