On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:19:46 -0700 Myles Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:44:37 +1000 > Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Monday 26 November 2001 10:10, Net Llama enunciated: > > > > > The problem with 15, to the best of my understanding is that it > forgets > > > to write all changes to disk when you shutdown the system. > Thus, > you > > > end up with massive amounts of fs corruption, especially on > boxes > that > > > have had long uptimes. It has nothing to do with the fs being > used. > > > > Thanks Lonni.............. > > yes, thanks for that bit of info... I'm now running 2.4.16pre1 as > well. > I haven't come across any fs corruption yet either but my uptime was > only something like 50 hrs. > You shouldn't have any trouble with that release, since it has the fs-corruption patch. I'm still waiting for gentoo to come up to speed on this, since they have several extra nice patches with each release that they choose to offer. I could do pristine source, but I'm in no hurry. -- Collins Richey Denver Area gentoo_rc6 k2.4.15-pre5+ext3+xfce+sylpheed+galeon _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users