On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:19:46 -0700 Myles Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:44:37 +1000
> Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > On Monday 26 November 2001 10:10, Net Llama enunciated:
> > 
> > > The problem with 15, to the best of my understanding is that it
> forgets
> > > to write all changes to disk when you shutdown the system. 
> Thus,
> you
> > > end up with massive amounts of fs corruption, especially on
> boxes
> that
> > > have had long uptimes.  It has nothing to do with the fs being
> used.
> > 
> > Thanks Lonni..............
> 
> yes, thanks for that bit of info... I'm now running 2.4.16pre1 as
> well.
> I haven't come across any fs corruption yet either but my uptime was
> only something like 50 hrs. 
> 

You shouldn't have any trouble with that release, since it has the
fs-corruption patch.  I'm still waiting for gentoo to come up to speed
on this, since they have several extra nice patches with each release
that they choose to offer.  I could do pristine source, but I'm in no
hurry.

-- 
Collins Richey
Denver Area
gentoo_rc6 k2.4.15-pre5+ext3+xfce+sylpheed+galeon
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to