On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 05:09:26 -0700 Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 06:45:11 -0500 "David A. Bandel" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:52:28 -0500 > > Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I just left kernel.org and noticed the new 2.5.0 beta kernel > > > sounce was posted for public consumption... > > > > > > Anyone else notice or working with it??? > > > > > > I just tossed 2.4.16 onto my test server. I've never had this > > > much fun in my OS/2 days! > > > > > > > 2.5.0 came out with 2.4.15. They both have the same shutdown > > filesystem corruption error. Fix was 2.4.16 and a patch to 2.5.0. > > Only difference is in the Makefile at the top where one says > > 2.4.15 and the other 2.5.0. > > > > You sure are slow. > > > > Re the 1.5.0 topic, I tried to patch 2.5.0 with the pre1 and pre2 > patches. pre2 went on with no complaints. For pre2 I got several > files with "Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume > -R?. I hit eneter, then "Apply anyway" reply n. Is this usual with > kernel patches. I don't have a clue what to do about these. Did I > make the right choices? Is this totally normal with kernel > patches? > I'm afraid to use the resulting kernel source until I know more. > Fingers working brain off, again. Of course I patched pre1 then pre2. -- Collins Richey Denver Area gentoo_rc6 k2.4.16+ext3+xfce+sylpheed+galeon _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
