On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 08:07:56PM -0500, Tim Wunder wrote: >Previously, Bill Campbell chose to write: .... >> Nope. It appears that the @home e-mail system's going away (it didn't work >> all that well in any case :-). The customer I just reconfigured had a >> notice with a new AT&T mailbox. > >Not from what I've heard/read, at least with Comcast (who's my cable >provider). But if you're right, that could only be a good thing. I've had >particularly vexing problems with @Home's mail service. This particular >problem turned out to be simply another in a long list of periodic mail >outages...
It's entirely possible that most of the changes will be to the @home customers serviced by AT&T (see today's www.userfriendly.org strip -- and serviced may be the type people growing up on farms know :-). The things I've read recently lead me to believe that AT&T has been attempting to buy the @home assets at a very low price, but then if nobody else is in the bidding that's OK by me. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``...I'm not one of those who think Bill Gates is the devil. I simply suspect that if Microsoft ever met up with the devil, it wouldn't need an interpreter.'' -- Nick Petreley _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
