On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 00:39:57 +1130 Mike Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 16:42, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > Another one to keep in mind is Borland, with the kylix thing being updated> > to c++. Shouldn't be too long, and I've used C++Builder on Windows with> > great pleasure. > > I don't know C++Builder is it Borland? And are you saying kylix is being > ported out of Delphi (Pascal) and into C++? This would mean the C__Far_Pascal > calls would be dropped for those addon C++ oops objects, a good thing(tm). C++ Builder is the C++ version of Delphi for windows. Where delphi is pascal and extremely fast to compile, builder is C++ and very much slower to compile, due to the complexity of the language. > > Where does this all fit in with the original post about a true blue Intel > compiler? I guess someone mentioned another brand that cost $500+ so I mentioned borland, which will probably end up as a freebee open edition download (for non commercial open-source work) or maybe $250/$300 for a commercial desktop development system. (I don't know any of this for fact, just reading newsgroups.)-- Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
