Today I'very got more info on this and setup is adsl to
modem modem to wireless router. 
Connection is faster before 7.30pm and after 10.30PM.

I'm gonna try and access a terminal and run a ping test for
24 hrs to a log file.

----- Original Message Follows -----
> In the past I've managed to get ISP's to run more in-depth
> checks of connections for clients by showing evidence of
> something wrong on their side.
> 
> I would have client run a script that did continuous pings
> to a problem site for a few days, if it replied with
> destination unreachable it immediately runs a traceroute. 
> Often times this would show an interruption getting
> through one of the ISP's servers and was enough to get
> them to investigate.  Sometimes it showed fault at clients
> end which was good too.
> 
> -Bryce Stenberg.
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [email protected]
> [mailto:linux-users- >[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Derek Smithies >Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014
> 9:26 AM >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: [Linux-users] DSL connection testing
> >
> >Dave,
> >  There is quite a bit of information you can glean from
> looking at the >arrival time
> >of packets, and round trip times. A just sit down with a
> laptop and test >experience
> >that lasts 30 seconds is almost completely worthless - as
> it does not >tell you how the
> >link is doing at any other time.
> >
> >I will quote a story from some years ago that happened to
> me - I may >have written it here before,
> >but it is too good not to use again.
> >A customer rang up and complained that his voice over the
> internet >implementation (that used my software)
> >had substandard audio quality. Connected to his network,
> measured link >quality with ping and scp and so on.
> >All ping times were good, file copies site to site were
> good. Of course, >I was connected at nighttime so that my
> >heavy testing did not interfere with his daytime usage.
> It was the usual >finger pointing game. Then I added
> >link testing (record ping times and drop rate) for all
> links my software >ran on. This data was graphed using
> javascript. >Beautiful. Turned out the guy had switched
> from cable link (which are >high quality) to a wireless
> internet service >provider. The wireless links were being
> flooded with data from all over >and packets were going
> missing. With the graphs, >we showed him that our software
> was fine - he was experiencing high >packet loss on the
> network. >
> >The basic first step is to record different performance
> metrics of the >link over a 24 hour period.
> >
> >1)Test dns lookup of different sites. Does that always
> work? Every 30 >seconds a test should run
> >
> >2)ping to remote host - how reliable is it?
> >
> >3)Telecom are offering unlimited home data plan (There
> was a comment >about someone in the
> >    states with an unlimited plan and doing 35T a month.
> >    Sheesh) The interesting part of telecom's plan is
> that they may shape your >traffic (limit it) during the
> >    evening. Which tells me that the peak time for
> network usage is in the >evening. Thus, measurements night
> >    time and day time should be different, if it is a
> shaping/network >load thing.
> >    Are the night time and day time measurements
> different? >
> >4)Automated tests to download data from a remote site -
> what is the >measured speed? and how does it vary over a
> 24 hour period? >
> >5)It is almost certain that your ISP (internet service
> provider) is >traffic shaping your data. You can verify
> >    this with a number of open source projects to
> determne if shaping is >happening, and how extreme it is.
> >    One could use such tools to plot the level of shaping
> they apply, and how brutal it is over a >24 hour period.
> >
> >6)Finally, does your router have a web access page with
> logs on it? If >so, do they tell you anything?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >  Derek.
> >
> >On 17/06/14 07:42, dave lilley wrote:
> >> anyone here able to suggest anyway of testing number of
> >> users connected to a line?
> >>
> >> Mate who lives in Downs Rd South eyreton commented to
> me >> about his link going down and he thinks too many
> people are >> on it up stream.
> >>
> >> mate says he spoke to the provider (not sure who it is)
> but >> think they claimed the link was ok, I was hoping to
> nip out >> using a linux lappie and test the line for some
> more solid >> answers, They use an apple ipad and an
> oldish PC. >>
> >> thanks for tips of many.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linux-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >>
> http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
> > >
> >--
> >Sent from my Ubuntu computer
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Linux-users mailing list
> >[email protected]
> >http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-user
> s _______________________________________________
> Linux-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to