On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Derek Smithies <[email protected]>
wrote:

> The proof of concept above seems a little strange. The person running the
> dhcp server puts some "illegal" code into
> one of the configuration areas. Seems like the admin person was out to
> attack his own network. Wow.
>

Yes, for the PoC. However, on any networks there's no protection against
any computer on there sending DHCP responses to the DHCP *broadcasts* that
a normal client sends.

So, if there are untrusted computers on the same network as you (which
usually isn't the case at home, unless a PC in there has become
compromised) they will be able to send rogue DHCP packets, and as there is
no authentication in DHCP your machine will proces them.



> I guess what I am trying to work out is why is the advise of some on this
> list that my adsl box is a security issue with this shell shock thing.
>

That's unrelated. They're probably observing that a potentially compromised
PC in your local network could be able to use a number of techniques to
attack your router, and this is just one more effective technique.

Don't worry about it - just patch what you can as soon as you can, and
don't allow untrusted machines onto your network. I have a separate SSID
for family visitors to use, for example.

-jim
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to