On Mon 16 Feb 2015 11:38:02 NZDT +1300, Derek Smithies wrote: > My understanding is that if you think of IPv6 as "just adding an > extra 96 bits to the addressing space" then you have it wrong. > There is much much more that was added.
Anyone able/care to post a summary? So far I haven't missed IPv6, and it's more annoying then anything else - un-typeable addresses of incomprehensible gobbledegook, stuff breaks, lots of complexity, privacy problems, ... My ISP doesn't offer it anyway (and shows no indications of changing that), but I'd never consider changing ISPs for something of no benefit to me. So, why bother? Thanks, Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann http://volker.top.geek.nz/ Please do not CC list postings to me. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
