On Mon 13 Apr 2015 22:11:16 NZST +1200, Steve Holdoway wrote: > SAS drives are so expensive, and I don't really think it would be > cost effective... SSDs of a similar size and software RAID will > out-perform it, and you could well want a few TB so straight SATA > would be a better idea in my opinion.
That's what the RAID is for, isn't it? Use cheap consumer drives, hot swap when needed. For this application it's cheap and the bandwidth should be sufficient. Always use either Linux software RAID, or a proper hardware RAID card (very expensive). Warning: most so-called RAID card are just software RAID anyway, but performed by a proprietory driver, with no bandwidth advantage and some big downsides. Talk about being RAIDed to the cleaners... > echo 0 >/selinux/enforce > > will temporarily disable to check further. IMO it's is terrible pile > of junk, written by people who don't understand base permissions, You mean like the NSA... ;-) (IIRC they started programming it.) Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann http://volker.top.geek.nz/ Please do not CC list postings to me. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
