Dear all, Adobe has just presented a first draft for revising their glyph name standard on http://www.topica.com/lists/opentype/read/message.html?mid=1602240723 The quarrel I have with this proposal is that it allows several alternative names for some glyphs, e.g. u20AC and uni20AC. Does this cause any unnecessary implementation headaches? Please Cc any comments to the proposal's author Sairus Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as well as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or be ignored. http://www.topica.com/lists/opentype Markus -- Markus G. Kuhn, Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK Email: mkuhn at acm.org, WWW: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/> - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
