Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author: Roozbeh Pournader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.utf8
> >
> > Why not submit a proposal to include them to Unicode?
>
> They are not characters. They are glyphs. The only reason they have
> encoded the current presentations forms is legacy character sets (I have
> heard that it was the Egypt government who pushed them). And both Unicode
> and JTC1/SC2/WG2 have agreed not to encode any more presentation forms
> (unless they exist in a character set used before 1991).
>
> I completely understand their idea, and agree with it. The presentation
> forms are against the sense of the standards. Yes, I know that if they
> didn't exist, good Unicode Arabic support would have needed to wait more,
> but in that case, we would have already agreed to the infrastructure
> needed for other cursive scripts, Indic ones, Syriac, and Tibetan (any
> missing?).
>
There is a legitimate need for encoding of presentation forms, though,
and there is some benefit to a system which encodes both in the same
namespace. It would be useful to have a parallel standard, or
something, which would give code points to presentation forms; perhaps
this would be a good use for the recently illegalized high planes.
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
