TK> I started to use xterm+luit in ja_JP.eucJP locale for my daily use
Tomohiro, you've made my day.
TK> Though I don't know Juliusz will like it, I am planning to use a
TK> small subset of Markus' SCW proposal, i.e., only
TK> CSI 1 w
I have absolutely no objection. What I do insist on:
- single shifts only;
- prefix (rather than Unicode-style suffix) sequences.
This is not only a luit matter. Luit was designed in order to keep as
much complexity as possible outside of XTerm; by implementing
something as complex as Markus' proposal in XTerm, you'd be sort of
destroying the whole purpose of luit.
I would be glad to hear an opinion from Thomas Dickey and Frank da
Cruz.
Juliusz
--
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
