On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Markus Kuhn wrote:
> Jungshik Shin wrote on 2002-02-23 22:30 UTC:
> > In addition, due to its another
> > not-so-insightful decision, whatever NF we use, we still are left with
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
not-so-insightful decision to ask UTC/ISO to remove canonical and
compatibility decomposition of cluster jamos into basic jamos(original
17 consonants and 11 vowels)
> > multiple representation of Hangul syllables as Kent noted. > >
Well, you can lobby with the Unicode consortium to at least formally >
define a Normalization Form J that uses only Jamos. Costs a factor three >
memory, not that it really matters in practice though.
You misunderstood what I wrote as 'multiple representation of Hangul
syllables'. See what Kent wrote in response to you.
Jungshik Shin
--
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
