One more thing we forgot to mention: http://www.mars.sphere.ne.jp/imamura/image1.html
Table 86 row 1 column 5 1-7624 # 1-86-4 7950c7951 < 0x17624 0xFA3E --- > 0x17624 0x69EA Can I assume that my JIS0213-GASPAR.TXT 0x69EA is the good one? You have dumplicate 0x69EA definition that clashed at: 0x1745C 0xFA3E I will update http://www.yudit.org/MAPPINGS pretty soon. On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Gaspar Sinai wrote: > Hi, > I concede to compatibility and other reasons. > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Bruno Haible wrote: > > 214c214 > > < 0x1233A 0x2299 > > --- > > > 0x1233A 0x29BF > > 555c555 > > < 0x12678 0x30D7 > > --- > > > 0x12678 0x31F7 0x309A > > > > These are indeed debatable. > > I checked some unciode fonts and most fonts had this glyph: 0x2299. > I concede. Lets use: > > 0x1233A 0x2299 > > That leaves us with > > 1. Problem of different unification > ----------------------------------- > > 555c555 > > < 0x12678 0x30D7 > > --- > > > 0x12678 0x31F7 0x309A > > Quick reference with gifs: > http://www.mars.sphere.ne.jp/imamura/image1.html > > Table 6 row 6 column 9 > Bruno> 0x12678 0x30D7 > Gaspar> 0x2678 0x31F7 0x309A # 1-6-88 (88 == 0x58) > > If we use 0x30D7 we will clash with: > > Table 5 row 4 column 8 > 0x8376 0x2557 0x30D7 # 1-5-55 (55 == 0x37) > > But I do not really like my own x31F7 0x309A either. > What shall we do? > > 2. Problem of undefined symbol. > ------------------------------ > Missing > > > 996,997c996,997 > > < 0x12B65 0xFFFD > > < 0x12B66 0xA4A3 > > --- > > > 0x12B65 0x02E9 0x02E5 > > > 0x12B66 0x02E5 0x02E9 > > I concede to Bruno's 0x12B66 0xA4A3. > But what shall we do with 0x12B65 0xFFFD? > Maybe another symbol added to Unicode Yi radicals? > > Table 11 row 5 column 6,7 > 0x2B65 ?????? # 1-11-69 (69 == 0x45) > 0x2B66 0xA4A3 # 1-11-70 (70 == 0x46) > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > It is only two points! I will udpate my maps after we > find a solution to these two problems. > > Then we sould make a matrix between our map and different > other maps on the web - but I would not change anything more > in our map till official map is published. > > As a reminder: having this map will not solve problems mentioned > by Kubota san. It just defines a map for JIS X 0213 and it will > possibly suffer from the same problems as existing, now obselete > JIS X 0208 and JIS X 0212 maps do. Please read his document - > I fully agree with him. > > But having a map makes it possible to continue the work. > > BTW: I would like to have a mapping table with two files - > usually x11 fonts come in two different files for the two > planes - I can use one file for each plane. > > Thank you, > gaspar > > > -- > Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels > Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/ > > -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
