>Actually, I rarely link with just one library. And if the two >(or more) different libraries had their identifiers normalized >into different forms, then no solution will be possible. >And since all these different codepoint representations of the >"same" character look alike, any but the most sophisticated >programmers will be defeated and just unable to link those two >libraries with the same program.
In a "decent" display system, the non-local-canonical library would look like funny characters, with \uXXXX escapes and whatnot. To use it, you would reference the functions in it by their actual names, not by ones that look similiar. -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
