> They have a 16-bit
> type called 'wchar_t' which cannot accomodate all characters since
> Unicode 3.1. So what they will likely end up doing is to use UTF-16
> as an encoding for 'wchar_t *' strings, 

As far as I am aware, that's what's *already* the case.  It may be
unfortunate that the type is called wchar_t, but it's much too late
to change that for that platform.

                /kent k

--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

Reply via email to