srintuar wrote:
> > 1) For printf("%s\n", "SchÃne GrÃÃe");
> ...
> Being that UTF-8 is sortof an an endpoint in the evolution of encodings,
> I also consider option 1 to be perfectly valid.
I would be careful with such statements. We don't know what the successor
of UTF-8 might look like, nor when it will appear (in 6 years? 10 years?
15 years?). But predictions like "A personal computer will never need more
than 640 KB of RAM" have too frequently turned out to be wrong.
Bruno
--
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
