Rich Felker wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:53:15PM -0400, ï¼³ï½?ï½?ï½?ï¼´ï½*ï½?ï½? wrote: ... ï¼µï½?ï½?ï½?ï½?ï½?ã??ï½?ï½?ï½*ã??ï½?ï½?ï½?ï½?ã??ï½?ï½?ï½-ï½?ï½?ï½?ï½?ã??ï½*ï½?ï½?ï¼?ï¼~ã?? > > ï½?ï½?ï½?ï½*ï½?ï½?ï½fï½?ï½?ã??ï½?ï½?ã??ï½?ï½?ï½*ï½?ã??ï½?ï½?ï½?ï½*ï½?ï½?ï½?ã?? > > Haha, was it your intent to use this huge japanese wide ascii? :) > Sadly I don't think Daniel can read anything but Latin-1...
Well, actually _I_ can (slowly), but right, my mailer can't. > Here's an ascii transliteration... > ~Rich > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:53:15PM -0400, SrinTuar wrote: ... > > The regular expression engine should be utf-8 aware. Of course! That's why I've been arguing that byte-based regular expression processing won't work with UTF-8. (E.g., if the match- any-character symbol "." matches any byte, it will break multi-byte sequences at places that aren't character boundaries.) Daniel -- Daniel Barclay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
