Ulrich Drepper wrote: : Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : > I'm told that AIX's compiler does not necessarily do this for uninitialized : > values (and have received a number of patches to make things initialized on : > that platform). : : This would be the OS which is responsible, not the compiler. In any : case, I cannot believe this. All kinds of code depends on this. You cannot claim an OS to be "responsible" for something required by a language. If there's a bug, it's the fault of the C run-time environment. Thomas Wolff - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- Re: Crash in xterm-136 with unicode patch 0.7 (termca... Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Crash in xterm-136 with unicode patch 0.7 (t... Henry Spencer
- Re: Crash in xterm-136 with unicode patch 0.7 (termca... Thomas Dickey
- Re: Crash in xterm-136 with unicode patch 0.7 (termca... Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Crash in xterm-136 with unicode patch 0.7 (t... Jean-Marc Desperrier
- Re: Crash in xterm-136 with unicode patch 0.7 (termca... Henry Spencer
- Re: Crash in xterm-136 with unicode patch 0.7 (t... Thomas Dickey
- Re: Crash in xterm-136 with unicode patch 0.7 (termca... Markus Kuhn
- Re: Crash in xterm-136 with unicode patch 0.7 (t... Thomas Dickey
- Re: Crash in xterm-136 with unicode patch 0.7 (t... Bruno Haible
- towo
