Henry Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The debate should center on whether there is *too much* overhead involved, No, the debate is over. There is internal checking code which can be compiled out. But there will be no code which prevents stupid users from hurting themselves. If you want this kind of thing finally start working on a debugging version of the library. This is planned but until then you won't get any such support. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------ - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- Dangerous glibc byte/wide stream interactions Markus Kuhn
- Re: Dangerous glibc byte/wide stream interactions Bruno Haible
- Re: Dangerous glibc byte/wide stream interactions Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Dangerous glibc byte/wide stream interactions Markus Kuhn
- Re: Dangerous glibc byte/wide stream interactio... Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Dangerous glibc byte/wide stream interactions Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Dangerous glibc byte/wide stream interactions Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Dangerous glibc byte/wide stream interactions Henry Spencer
- Re: Dangerous glibc byte/wide stream interactio... Kaz Kylheku
- Re: Dangerous glibc byte/wide stream interactio... Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Dangerous glibc byte/wide stream interactions Markus Kuhn
- Re: Dangerous glibc byte/wide stream interactio... Bruno Haible
