Harald Alvestrand writes:

> has anyone taken a look (or want to) on the internet-draft
> draft-ietf-idn-nameprep-00.txt, to think about whether it is 
> easy/sensible/hard/nonsensical to implement it?

It is quite sensible; the draft can be implemented in ca. two weeks of
coding. It can be done with good performance with rather small tables:
2 KB for the prohibit table, 7 KB for the lowercasing table, and a
similar amount for the composition tables needed for UTR15.

But the draft leaves two questions open:

- Is Han folding (canon-2.3) completely removed from the proposal,
  or is it only postponed until a later draft? I'm noting that a
  different draft says "There are no well-established rules for
  such folding, and some of the proposed folding would be
  locale-specific." - therefore Han folding appears not to be suitable
  for inclusion in such a canonicalization engine.

- What is the encoding in which internationalized domain names are
  exchanged between DNS servers? UTF-8 or UTF-5?

Bruno
-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/

Reply via email to