> > Why not?  If you're going to interpret "_^H " as an underlined
> > space, then it would only make sense to interpret "_^H_" as an
> > underlined underscore.

OTOH "a^Ha" is interpreted as bold "a" for any character "a".
So there is an ambiguity when "a" is "_": when one is interpreted OK,
the other is inconsistent.

-- 
 __("<  Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
 \__/
  ^^                      SYGNATURA ZASTĘPCZA
QRCZAK

-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/

Reply via email to