On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:42:49PM +0100, Markus Kuhn wrote:
> Roozbeh Pournader wrote on 2001-05-11 16:02 UTC:
> > 2. Allowing 5 and 6-byte UTF-8, which Unicode 3.1 forbids.
>
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html#ucsutf
>
> Neither of these is a deviation of ISO 10646, which has a somewhat
> broader scope than Unicode and is (at least in the context of
> communication with ISO 6429 terminals) the preferred reference.
Are you sure this isn't a deviation of ISO 10646? I thought they
removed the 5 and 6-byte UTF-8 sequences in the latest stuff.
--
David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
