On 15-May-01 Robert de Bath wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> PS: The spammers seem to think it's illegal too. :-)
>
> PPS: I did consider using !*$%#!!
> but that's too evil. :-)
Ok, sorry for it:). Will see what we can do about it.
Regards,
Hans
>
> --
> Rob. (Robert de Bath <rdebath @ poboxes.com>)
> <http://www.cix.co.uk/~mayday>
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>> -----FW: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-----
>>
>> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 17:46:25 +0200
>> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> From: The Post Office <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Invalid message envelope information
>>
>> The following message arrived with illegal envelope data, typically a
>> mangled address that doesn't obey the RFC822/976 protocol specification.
>> If you do not recognize the source of the bad header, perhaps you should
>> contact a Postmaster at your site and ask why your mail was rejected.
>>
>>
>> From: Robert de Bath <[email protected]>
>>
>> --------------End of forwarded message-------------------------
>>
>>
>> Linux : http://linux.gelrevision.nl/
>> phpReview : http://phpReview.nl.linux.org/
>> Boeken : http://nl.linux.org/boeken/
>> -
>> Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
>> Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
Linux : http://linux.gelrevision.nl/
phpReview : http://phpReview.nl.linux.org/
Boeken : http://nl.linux.org/boeken/
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
