Tomohiro KUBOTA writes: > Thus, I don't understand why it is important for the ISO 2022 > parser to support UTF-8, Big5, and so on, because these encodings > will be supported by -lc mode of XTerm. ISO 2022 parser is > important only for encodings which are not supported by iconv() > or libiconv. Yes. Furthermore, there are no such encodings for which ISO 2022 would be the exclusive solution, because all encodings that are in real use today are supported by glibc iconv() and libiconv. Bruno - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Jungshik Shin
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Jungshik Shin
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Jungshik Shin
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Markus Kuhn
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Frank da Cruz
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Jungshik Shin
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Keld J�rn Simonsen
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Tomohiro KUBOTA
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Jungshik Shin
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Kiyokazu SUTO
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Bruno Haible
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Bruno Haible
- Re: Adjusting terminal via ISO 2022 to locale encoding Juliusz Chroboczek
