On Thu, 24 May 2001, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Markus,
>
> Thanks for writing the document in
>
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/scw-proposal.html
>
> I am not very keen on adding yet another piece of state to terminal
I definitly second this, we've just go rid of the iso-2022 state and
_really_ don't want to re-introduce the problems.
> WO2: next character has width 2.
Currently I've done this as a combining character ie:
WO2: previous character has width 2.
It may fit better with unicode encoding ... but I don't know if it'd
work with WO1.
Is there a preference for how WO0/1/2 should be encoded?
--
Rob. (Robert de Bath <rdebath @ poboxes.com>)
<http://www.cix.co.uk/~mayday>
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
