Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author: Frank da Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.utf8
>
> The UTF-8 which allows non-shortest sequences to be read versus the one that
> does not. The UTF-8 which emits non-shortest sequences versus one that does
> not. The UTF-8 which "decodes" surrogates versus the one that treats them as
> if they were regular UCS-2 characters. The UTF-8 that is limited to 6-bit
> seqences versus the unlimited one. There's a lot of talk on the Unico[dr]e
> lists about this recently, and new proposals for modifications to UTF-8
> surface all the time (the current hot topic is UTF-8S, proposed by Oracle).
>
There is only one UTF-8. The rest are bugs.
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
