[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) writes:

> * Do we need a "native" wide char encoding, too (mostly for Win32 where  
> it's UTF-16, but possibly also some Asian thing)?

A single 'char' encoded in UTF-16?  This sounds horrible.
-
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

Reply via email to