"H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > Does that mean you're painting yourself into a corner, though, > requiring manual work to integrate the increasingly Unicode-based > infrastructure support that is becoming available? Odds are pretty > good that they are.
Since I volunteered to help with this effort, I'd like to know what's already out there. I agree that duplicating functionality in the Emacs code that is already available from supported free libraries would be a bad idea unless there is a compelling reason. Of course, Emacs is buildable on most systems that have a working C compiler and a standard implementation of libc. Depending on anything else, unless it can be imported into the Emacs source tree would be a questionable idea. -- D. Dale Gulledge, Sr. Programmer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] C, C++, Perl, Unix (AIX, Linux), Oracle, Java, Internationalization (i18n), Awk. - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
