Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Supporting Unicode superficially while retaining the current internal > representation raises a number of problems, one of them being that the > internal representation has several alternatives for the same character > which correspond to the same code point in Unicode.
The GNU Emacs/Unicode proposal I've seen seems to have this property, too. (At least the proposal is ambiguous, and one interpretation is that you can encode a single character in multiple ways.) - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
