Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author: David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.utf8
>
> Why do you think clients that can't display these quotes are broken? By
> the nature of the PC console, the Linux console (on the ix86, at least)
> can only display 512 different characters, 256 if you want bold
> characters. Conformant Unicode systems can support whatever set of
> characters they want. Give me a list of characters (< 256) that
> en_*.UTF-8 should support, and a consensus, then we can start
> claiming they're broken and fixing them.
>
Not quite true -- it can only support 512 *GLYPHS*. This limitation
remains in the frame buffer consoles which most systems can use these
days, although for no good reason -- it should be trivial to extend to
at least 2048 (at that point the mapping system Linux uses for "direct
to font" breaks down; additional code points could be added for that
purpose using a high plane.)
However, those 512 glyphs can represent additional characters as needed.
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
