On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > In addition, I'm not willing to invest much time into BIDI (which > requires completely different data structures); do people think that > strict L2R is useful enough?
Useful for many it will be, for sure. But just don't say that you will never support Bidi. Put it somewhere in the TODO, so someday one cute prince may arrive and ... > Finally, would people be willing to use a piece of code that requires > Bruno Haible's CLISP to be installed? Or do you think that exclusive > use of stone-age languages is a must? For me, it's somehow a problem of distributions. Is the prerequisite available in major distributions? (Sorry for the business sense of the sentence....) roozbeh -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
