Hello Francois, As your questions are not Web-related at all, may I suggest that you don't copy [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the moment? If you have some Web and Internationalization related questions, please feel free to come back here.
Regards, Martin. At 09:48 01/12/13 -0500, Richard, Francois M wrote: >I have been posting quite regularly questions about utf-8 support/Locale on >Linux (and Solaris). Before asking one more, I would like to thank people >who contributed to theses discussions. Your feedback and replies have been >always very interesting and most of the time very valuable ;)... Thanks for >taking some of your time to answer. > >We were doing some testing with a piece of C code on Linux (Locale sensitive >thanks to SetLocale() and with a system Locale set first to en_US.utf8 and >then to sv_SV.utf8) and it looks like magically strcoll() was sorting the >utf-8 file read in input(two characters only: $Bg(Band z). So in en_US.utf8, >$Bg(Bcame first, then z. And in sv_SV.uft8, z came first, then $Bg(B > >Does it mean strcoll() properly handle utf-8 data??? I would be very >surprised. But how to explain the proper sorting results we got? > >Is there somewhere an extensive list indicating which C char functions do >handle utf-8 properly and which ones do not (and as a result need to be >replaced with wide C functions to correctly manipulate utf-8 data)? That >would save us a lot of time since interpreting our test results is not in >fact that obvious. > >Fran$BmP(Bis > -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
