> > Assumption: > > A diacritic is the small part added to a letter to form a > > digraph, like acute would be the diacritic for e with acute. > > And it genreally doesn't change the width of the resulting di or trigraph.
I did not yet see this connection, something else learned on the fly ;) > > Question: > > Is there a difference between the diacritics which dumpkeys > > shows as being synonyma? How do I have to understand synomym? > > The reason linux loadkeys works like that is only for simplicity and due > to technical constraints. > In those old days, when dead_ogonek, dead_caron, > dead_breve, dead_doubleacute was needed in some > keymap, it was not available, and one of the above > six had to be used instead. Thank you, Pablo and Andries, now I understand. -- Erika Pacholleck -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
