On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:06:05PM +0100, Brian Foster wrote:
>   one point raised, however, needs a reply.  a question was
>  asked whether or not what the note called the `Linux encoding'
>  (a bi-directional UCS-2/US-ASCII mapping, and clearly a hack
>  not a standard) exists in Linux.
> 
>   the best answer is a reference to current Linux source code.
>  so, via the LXF project, the following URL is the /*comment*/
>  in the Linux `fat' filesystem describing an un-named encoding
>  identical to the `Linux encoding':

Huh?  FAT is the old DOS/Windows filesystem; Linux merely has an
implementation of it for compatibility.  Any weird encodings used by
it have nothing to do with Linux.

I assume this weird encoding is what NT uses to store Unicode when
it's in VFAT backwards-compatibility mode; I don't know for sure.

-- 
Glenn Maynard
--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

Reply via email to