> Michael B Allen wrote:
>> I didn't know wchar_t was supposed to be able to represent
>> an entire character.
>
> If wchar_t is not an entire character, the functions defined in
> <wctype.h>,
> like iswprint(), make no sense. And indeed, on Windows with UTF-16 as
> encoding of 'wchar_t *' strings, they make no sense.

I don't understand. What's the difference between using iswprint() with
UTF-16 and isprint() with UTF-8?

Mike
--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

Reply via email to