Hi! Selon Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It is a good idea, but what range of UTF-8 do you think? > Of course I am interested in whether CJK characters are > supported or not. Others would interested in other range > of characters, doublewidth, bidi, or combining characters.
May be we should think "UTF-8 encoding" instead of "UTF-8 charset"! What we all need at first, IMHO, is to be able to work in UTF-8 mode only: UTF-8 streams everywhere, like in Plan9. The charset range is not that important at this moment. It is a matter of pre-processing (input methods) or post-processing (display methods), which could be kernel modules, isn't it? > If you think something (from the items listed above) would > be excluded, please say "UTF-8 excluding foo and bar". In my case I never think about excluding our Japanese friends, or even any other UTF-8 concerned people! Any implementation should keep in mind that it should work for *anybody* as soon as possible, even if we can not make it work right now; make the code extensible! Best Regards, JC, french people living in Vietnam... ;-) -- Jean Christophe Andr� Agence universitaire de la Francophonie - Bureau Asie Pacifique -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
